Oh Ireland, land of my father's father's father, why are you forsaking freedom?
Fight the Lisbon Treaty and you may die; join, and you'll live... at least a while.
(Insert Uilleann Pipes playing "A Nation Once Again".)
And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days, from this day to that, for a chance, just one chance, to go back and tell your enemies that they may take your lives, but they may never take your freedom!!!
ERIN GO BRAGH! (Gaelic: Ireland Forever.)
(The preceding was largely stolen from William Wallace's speech about Scotland.)
Showing posts with label Foreign Powers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foreign Powers. Show all posts
Monday, June 01, 2009
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Provocateurs Pollute Protests, Posing as Peacful 'til They Pelt Police; Plus, Punks in Plymouth Plan to Pummel People with Plastic Playthings
(Preface: nothing here is April Fools stuff; I hold myself to a higher standard than that.)
The G20, an internationalist attempt at creating all the conditions and setting all the precedents of Global Governance, has its share of protests in Britain.
As you probably know, the protests are in full swing; and I say, "Right on!"
Because here's the thing, while I'm not an anarchist, which some of the protesters may be, I stand for the well-known saying, "Government governs best which governs least."
So, of course, I am absolutely committed to the permanent adjournment of any form of world government or even a semi-permanent international assembly.
I am therefore with the protesters on this one, as humans are endowed by their creator with the inalienable right of assembly and the right for a redress of grievances.
Now, to the meat of the issue.
It is no secret or "conspiracy theory" that the government, be it Great Britain, the U.S., or Canada, is against any protests and will do anything to stop them.
It has been thoroughly documented that there are, planted amongst the crowd, "agents provocateurs".
These are police or other governmental entities that have disguised themselves as protesters for the purpose of provoking violence from the crowd, though in some documented cases they simply gathering intelligence on who it is that is organizing and comprising the protests; they also have the purpose of demonizing the actual, peaceful protesters, who are then assumed to be violent by the media, who then demonize their message.
Provocateurs are being increasingly found out, such as was the case with the SPP protests in Canada, and the DNC protests in Colorado.
In the SPP's case, the protesters realized that the masked men throwing rocks at police, attempting to instigate a riot, were indeed policemen themselves, and thus tried to pull off their masks and expose them as such.
The provocateurs then sidled up to the police line and whispered a few words to one of the police in riot gear, who then "arrested" them and took them out of view.
The people exposing this outrage were called liars and conspiracy theorists for saying this, until the videos came out proving it.
In the similar case of the DNC, the Denver Police Department later admitted that they were indeed policemen, and it was all a planned operation.
Didn't hear that in the news, did you?
I would include the raw footage of the SPP protest which is available on YouTube, but it contains brief language; this news report will suffice:
This is what to expect from the G20 protests, undoubtedly.
The police have already "uncovered a terrorist plot" against the G20 in Plymouth.
This plot was set to be so devastating that they had to bring in bomb disposal experts to disarm the plotters.
The five people, three men, aged 25, 19, and 16, plus two women, both 20, were apparently planning to raid the G20 with their expert knowledge of firearms and explosives. They are being held on terrorism charges.
Actually, that was yesterday's news, as it has since been discovered that their "arsenal" consisted of plastic cap-guns, and their "explosives" were actually fireworks; not to mention the "extremist material" which was also confiscated turned out to be writings "relating to political ideology".
This is sad, people.
So, please, whenever you see violent political protests, don't be so quick to judge the protesters there, because they may just be hijacked by policemen provocateurs.
(NOTICE: The moderator would once again wish to assure the reader that nothing in this post has anything to do with the antics of April 1st. The moderator does not advocate violent protests, as that's poor delivery of one's message. Neither does the moderator advocate storming meetings with cap-guns, as that really doesn't do anything, and fireworks are just pretty; except those stupid, boring snakes that don't make any noise or do anything but inflate into giant lengths of ash. That's probably what the Plymouth Plotters had for explosives, anyway: boring snakes. Sometimes cap-guns can be dangerous, as the little red strips of paper can catch on fire, causing copious amounts of smoke that can get in your eyes and nostrils and can be irritating. Actually, I just wanted to use the word "copious". There is also a strong smell of sulfur in the air that is sometimes appealing, as it smells like victory, especially when fighting imaginary Indians; though, it does nothing to bankers. "Mercy! They have cap-guns and fireworks! God Save the Queen!"
The G20, an internationalist attempt at creating all the conditions and setting all the precedents of Global Governance, has its share of protests in Britain.
As you probably know, the protests are in full swing; and I say, "Right on!"
Because here's the thing, while I'm not an anarchist, which some of the protesters may be, I stand for the well-known saying, "Government governs best which governs least."
So, of course, I am absolutely committed to the permanent adjournment of any form of world government or even a semi-permanent international assembly.
I am therefore with the protesters on this one, as humans are endowed by their creator with the inalienable right of assembly and the right for a redress of grievances.
Now, to the meat of the issue.
It is no secret or "conspiracy theory" that the government, be it Great Britain, the U.S., or Canada, is against any protests and will do anything to stop them.
It has been thoroughly documented that there are, planted amongst the crowd, "agents provocateurs".
These are police or other governmental entities that have disguised themselves as protesters for the purpose of provoking violence from the crowd, though in some documented cases they simply gathering intelligence on who it is that is organizing and comprising the protests; they also have the purpose of demonizing the actual, peaceful protesters, who are then assumed to be violent by the media, who then demonize their message.
Provocateurs are being increasingly found out, such as was the case with the SPP protests in Canada, and the DNC protests in Colorado.
In the SPP's case, the protesters realized that the masked men throwing rocks at police, attempting to instigate a riot, were indeed policemen themselves, and thus tried to pull off their masks and expose them as such.
The provocateurs then sidled up to the police line and whispered a few words to one of the police in riot gear, who then "arrested" them and took them out of view.
The people exposing this outrage were called liars and conspiracy theorists for saying this, until the videos came out proving it.
In the similar case of the DNC, the Denver Police Department later admitted that they were indeed policemen, and it was all a planned operation.
Didn't hear that in the news, did you?
I would include the raw footage of the SPP protest which is available on YouTube, but it contains brief language; this news report will suffice:
This is what to expect from the G20 protests, undoubtedly.
The police have already "uncovered a terrorist plot" against the G20 in Plymouth.
This plot was set to be so devastating that they had to bring in bomb disposal experts to disarm the plotters.
The five people, three men, aged 25, 19, and 16, plus two women, both 20, were apparently planning to raid the G20 with their expert knowledge of firearms and explosives. They are being held on terrorism charges.
Actually, that was yesterday's news, as it has since been discovered that their "arsenal" consisted of plastic cap-guns, and their "explosives" were actually fireworks; not to mention the "extremist material" which was also confiscated turned out to be writings "relating to political ideology".
This is sad, people.
So, please, whenever you see violent political protests, don't be so quick to judge the protesters there, because they may just be hijacked by policemen provocateurs.
(NOTICE: The moderator would once again wish to assure the reader that nothing in this post has anything to do with the antics of April 1st. The moderator does not advocate violent protests, as that's poor delivery of one's message. Neither does the moderator advocate storming meetings with cap-guns, as that really doesn't do anything, and fireworks are just pretty; except those stupid, boring snakes that don't make any noise or do anything but inflate into giant lengths of ash. That's probably what the Plymouth Plotters had for explosives, anyway: boring snakes. Sometimes cap-guns can be dangerous, as the little red strips of paper can catch on fire, causing copious amounts of smoke that can get in your eyes and nostrils and can be irritating. Actually, I just wanted to use the word "copious". There is also a strong smell of sulfur in the air that is sometimes appealing, as it smells like victory, especially when fighting imaginary Indians; though, it does nothing to bankers. "Mercy! They have cap-guns and fireworks! God Save the Queen!"
Sunday, March 01, 2009
CPAC, CFR, and The Constitution
"We want every American to be the best he or she chooses to be.
We recognize that we are all individuals. We love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. [Applause]
We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause]
Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you." ~Rush Limbaugh
A great speech overall, but I have a few issues with it, and with the speaker.
First of all, you will notice in the second paragraph that he mentions the "inarguable truth" in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution that we are endowed by our creator with the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Before I continue, let me mention that he was awarded the "Defender of the Constitution" award.
The preamble to the Constitution, you know, the "We the People" document, doesn't say anything about life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness; that's a quote from the Declaration of Independence.
"Ooh, Soory!" ~Alex Trebek
Secondly, how can a man who talks to millions of people everyday, setting the opinion of those who would receive it (don't worry, I'm not a Fairness Doctrine crazy; I know he doesn't set public opinion), be given an award recognizing his "defense of the Constitution", and be lauded as a leader within the "conservative movement" when he puts out the disinformation that the Council on Foreign Relations does not exist.
The Council on Foreign Relations, which has been mentioned on mainstream news programming as actively functioning, is a think-tank for Globalism and one-world government. Many members are politicians such as, admittedly, Dick Cheney:
Ha, ha, ha; Cheney, you are soooo funny.
To understand the basics of the CFR, it requires a goodly amount of time, which I don't currently have, as it is late and I'm slightly cranky. *Smiles Weakly*
Here's an "okay" video that I found; more informative info will follow:
We recognize that we are all individuals. We love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. [Applause]
We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause]
Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you." ~Rush Limbaugh
A great speech overall, but I have a few issues with it, and with the speaker.
First of all, you will notice in the second paragraph that he mentions the "inarguable truth" in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution that we are endowed by our creator with the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Before I continue, let me mention that he was awarded the "Defender of the Constitution" award.
The preamble to the Constitution, you know, the "We the People" document, doesn't say anything about life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness; that's a quote from the Declaration of Independence.
"Ooh, Soory!" ~Alex Trebek
Secondly, how can a man who talks to millions of people everyday, setting the opinion of those who would receive it (don't worry, I'm not a Fairness Doctrine crazy; I know he doesn't set public opinion), be given an award recognizing his "defense of the Constitution", and be lauded as a leader within the "conservative movement" when he puts out the disinformation that the Council on Foreign Relations does not exist.
The Council on Foreign Relations, which has been mentioned on mainstream news programming as actively functioning, is a think-tank for Globalism and one-world government. Many members are politicians such as, admittedly, Dick Cheney:
Ha, ha, ha; Cheney, you are soooo funny.
To understand the basics of the CFR, it requires a goodly amount of time, which I don't currently have, as it is late and I'm slightly cranky. *Smiles Weakly*
Here's an "okay" video that I found; more informative info will follow:
Saturday, August 09, 2008
Guangzhou! Gesundheit.
Guangzhou, a Communist city in Communist China, has banned all motorcycles because of crime and pollution.
Take a moment to let that sink in, if you must.
Yes, we have no motorcycles in Guangzhou.
And, as they say, as Guangzhou goes, so goes the world.
They say that there were too many muggings committed with motorcycles as the getaway vehicle, so they banned them. Hmm.
Oh, and they also contributed to pollution, and thus, to global warming.
So, that makes it all better!
Since it is a scientific fact that the Earth’s climate has been alternating between hot and cold ever since Adam officially left the keys at the gate to the ever so clichéd Garden of Eden, why in the world would any reasoning Human Being actually think that global warming is new to the Earth?
But, I digress.
Let us never forget the tyranny and despotism of China, Britain, Germany, Russia, France, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York.
Take a moment to let that sink in, if you must.
Yes, we have no motorcycles in Guangzhou.
And, as they say, as Guangzhou goes, so goes the world.
They say that there were too many muggings committed with motorcycles as the getaway vehicle, so they banned them. Hmm.
Oh, and they also contributed to pollution, and thus, to global warming.
So, that makes it all better!
Since it is a scientific fact that the Earth’s climate has been alternating between hot and cold ever since Adam officially left the keys at the gate to the ever so clichéd Garden of Eden, why in the world would any reasoning Human Being actually think that global warming is new to the Earth?
But, I digress.
Let us never forget the tyranny and despotism of China, Britain, Germany, Russia, France, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Websites That Make This One Possible
