Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Invisible Empire: A New Tool in the Information War
Found at Tennesee Sons of Liberty. Contains brief footage from Kennedy's assassination, so viewer discretion is advised.
A newcomer to the Information War, Invisible Empire, created by the same people that made Endgame and The Obama Deception, looks to be a very informational and interesting chronicling of our times and how we got here. This preview contains much of a speech by John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who was, I believe, our last true President.
In this Information War, there are many selfless men who have placed their lives and fortunes in harm's way to help our side win, which is the side of goodness and humanity; I feel there is no such thing as a "small part" in this InfoWar. These are the "InfoWarriors".
I am a Christian, and am not so much required as I am compelled by my Faith to warn and help direct my fellow Christians and fellow man toward Saving Knowledge. I am as incapable of saving as I am incapable of leading to that end, as I can merely help. Wretchedly as I do this, I try.
I would see a person as a miserable creature, lower than dust, if they did not grab a man by the arm who did not see the bus speeding down the road, or did not warn that family next door, who had no means of communication, that a tornado had just touched down nearby.
So, too, would I hold equally as miserable a creature that slapped the helping hand off of his arm, or laughed at the man that warned of imminent danger, who, not caring to save his own family, would rather not entertain such an "impossibility".
I make no career of warning the masses; perhaps I should, but I do not. I see well-versed men taking up that role, putting aside their daily lives and lessening their time with their families; being so wrapped-up in saving our nation that they hardly have a life left for themselves. I help these men disseminate information when I can, this blog being a tool of that, and I ask you to do the same.
There was a time, during our country's beginnings, when men would drop their plows and pocketbooks and sign up to fight for a season while their country was at war. Some signed on with the Regulars as a permanent arm of military might; had every man joined the Regulars, though, there wouldn't have been men left at home to create a cultivated, well-kept, plenteous country worth the fight.
I am no InfoWarrior; perhaps, though, I am an InfoMilitiaman.
Why not investigate what you do not know to be fact? Why, instead of saying, "There is no 'New World Order'," do you not look into it for yourself? Why, instead of listening to men on TV tell you to believe or not believe something because you should trust them, do you not question that trust and investigate their claims?
"These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so." ~Acts 17:11
A newcomer to the Information War, Invisible Empire, created by the same people that made Endgame and The Obama Deception, looks to be a very informational and interesting chronicling of our times and how we got here. This preview contains much of a speech by John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who was, I believe, our last true President.
In this Information War, there are many selfless men who have placed their lives and fortunes in harm's way to help our side win, which is the side of goodness and humanity; I feel there is no such thing as a "small part" in this InfoWar. These are the "InfoWarriors".
I am a Christian, and am not so much required as I am compelled by my Faith to warn and help direct my fellow Christians and fellow man toward Saving Knowledge. I am as incapable of saving as I am incapable of leading to that end, as I can merely help. Wretchedly as I do this, I try.
I would see a person as a miserable creature, lower than dust, if they did not grab a man by the arm who did not see the bus speeding down the road, or did not warn that family next door, who had no means of communication, that a tornado had just touched down nearby.
So, too, would I hold equally as miserable a creature that slapped the helping hand off of his arm, or laughed at the man that warned of imminent danger, who, not caring to save his own family, would rather not entertain such an "impossibility".
I make no career of warning the masses; perhaps I should, but I do not. I see well-versed men taking up that role, putting aside their daily lives and lessening their time with their families; being so wrapped-up in saving our nation that they hardly have a life left for themselves. I help these men disseminate information when I can, this blog being a tool of that, and I ask you to do the same.
There was a time, during our country's beginnings, when men would drop their plows and pocketbooks and sign up to fight for a season while their country was at war. Some signed on with the Regulars as a permanent arm of military might; had every man joined the Regulars, though, there wouldn't have been men left at home to create a cultivated, well-kept, plenteous country worth the fight.
I am no InfoWarrior; perhaps, though, I am an InfoMilitiaman.
Why not investigate what you do not know to be fact? Why, instead of saying, "There is no 'New World Order'," do you not look into it for yourself? Why, instead of listening to men on TV tell you to believe or not believe something because you should trust them, do you not question that trust and investigate their claims?
"These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so." ~Acts 17:11
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
'Bama in Berlin
I rediscovered this video over at a blog I frequent, Tennessee Sons of Liberty, with the topic being about the goals of the Council on Foreign Relations.
I'm surprised the fellow who put this video together did not mention the fact that Hitler actually used the phrase "new world order".
"National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order." ~Adolf Hitler
Look at the key phrases in the video, "global citizenship", "required to do more", "not a choice", "the only way, the one way", "protect our common security"; no ambiguities there.
I remember reading about the first time all mankind came together, with common cause and common language, to build a great tower reaching to Heaven.
Didn't work out.
I remember reading about the first time all mankind came together, with common cause and common language, to build a great tower reaching to Heaven.
Didn't work out.
Saturday, April 04, 2009
In Other News...
Headline from the Telegraph:
"G20: Gordon Brown Announces 'new world order'"
Headline from AOL News:
"G20 leaders pledge $1.1 trillion to usher in 'new world order'"
Headline from Globe and Mail:
"G20 ushers in a 'new world order'"
Headline from Gold News:
"The G20's New World Order"
Headline from The Independent:
"G20 summit: New world order?"
Headline from Bankok Post:
"Massive G20 spending to usher in 'new world order'"
Hey, I think I'm seeing a trend...
From Newstrack India:
"G20 leaders pledge 1.1 trillion to usher in 'new world order'"
From The Zeleza Post:
"The G20 Summit: Stalling a New World Economic Order"
From allAfrica.com:
"Nigeria: G20, Global Recession, New World Order And the Country"
From CNN Money:
"G20: Shaping a new world order"
From The Scotsman:
G20 analysis: A new world order - built on shaky foundations"
Definitely seeing something - not quite sure what it is, though.
Maybe Anderson Cooper and CNN would give us a clue as to what the big deal is:
Hm, a little unclear.
Ooh, Henry Kissinger, could you give us a run-down on whether or not there is a New World Order?
Oh well, I guess it was just a theory after all.
"G20: Gordon Brown Announces 'new world order'"
Headline from AOL News:
"G20 leaders pledge $1.1 trillion to usher in 'new world order'"
Headline from Globe and Mail:
"G20 ushers in a 'new world order'"
Headline from Gold News:
"The G20's New World Order"
Headline from The Independent:
"G20 summit: New world order?"
Headline from Bankok Post:
"Massive G20 spending to usher in 'new world order'"
Hey, I think I'm seeing a trend...
From Newstrack India:
"G20 leaders pledge 1.1 trillion to usher in 'new world order'"
From The Zeleza Post:
"The G20 Summit: Stalling a New World Economic Order"
From allAfrica.com:
"Nigeria: G20, Global Recession, New World Order And the Country"
From CNN Money:
"G20: Shaping a new world order"
From The Scotsman:
G20 analysis: A new world order - built on shaky foundations"
Definitely seeing something - not quite sure what it is, though.
Maybe Anderson Cooper and CNN would give us a clue as to what the big deal is:
Hm, a little unclear.
Ooh, Henry Kissinger, could you give us a run-down on whether or not there is a New World Order?
Oh well, I guess it was just a theory after all.
Friday, April 03, 2009
The Age of Precedents
Yes, I am calling the political era in which we live the Age of Precedents.
Why? Because everyday, every thing that is done on a political or judicial level, the world over, is setting a precedent, whether it be hot or cold, good or evil, Constitutional or tyrannical.
This G20 meeting is one of many meetings and organizations that is setting the precedent of global integration and internationalism; that, in order to solve the domestic problems caused by a hijacked government, it is now necessary to band all of the closet-tyrants of the world together to continue that which has been spoken of for almost a century: the "New World Order".
"Oh, but that's a conspiracy theory..."
Wrong!
How about a quote from the horse's mouth, hm?
Please watch the entire clip, it isn't very long:
Still a conspiracy theory?
How about a quote from a horse of a different color, a horse who has been pushing for years that people who talk about a New World Order are "conspiracy theorists", Sean Hannity, and Clinton's own Dick Morris:
"You're not wrong. You're not wrong."
It is no longer coming, it is here. The New World Order is upon us. You heard it from the man himself.
We have gone through the looking glass into an upside-down world.
"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." ~II Chronicles 7:14
(Emphasis mine, words are God's.)
Why? Because everyday, every thing that is done on a political or judicial level, the world over, is setting a precedent, whether it be hot or cold, good or evil, Constitutional or tyrannical.
This G20 meeting is one of many meetings and organizations that is setting the precedent of global integration and internationalism; that, in order to solve the domestic problems caused by a hijacked government, it is now necessary to band all of the closet-tyrants of the world together to continue that which has been spoken of for almost a century: the "New World Order".
"Oh, but that's a conspiracy theory..."
Wrong!
How about a quote from the horse's mouth, hm?
Please watch the entire clip, it isn't very long:
Still a conspiracy theory?
How about a quote from a horse of a different color, a horse who has been pushing for years that people who talk about a New World Order are "conspiracy theorists", Sean Hannity, and Clinton's own Dick Morris:
"You're not wrong. You're not wrong."
It is no longer coming, it is here. The New World Order is upon us. You heard it from the man himself.
We have gone through the looking glass into an upside-down world.
"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." ~II Chronicles 7:14
(Emphasis mine, words are God's.)
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Appropriate Appellation
You've probably heard the uproar about them changing the name of the building replacing the Twin Towers from "Freedom Tower" to "One World Trade Center".
Why is there such an uproar?
Other than the fact that the word "Freedom" is now a "double-plus ungood" word, the arrangement of words in the new name might just pass by some people.
Glenn Beck and others are angry because they liked the term "Freedom Tower", and because they only changed it to be more marketable; but, what appears to have slipped right by them is the new name!
Let me spell it out, just in case you didn't quite make the connection the first time: One World Trade Center.
They've already begun using the term "1WTC", as that's more acceptable than it's true, full, blatant name of "One World Trade Center".
"One World" is, of course, one of the many terms used by the CFR, Bilderburg, Trilateral Commission, and others in reference to "World Government", also known as the "New World Order", "New Order", "World Order", and "New Economic Order", "New International Order", "Internationalism", and "The Tower of Babel".
(The latter term mostly used by its opponents; opponents being those who wish to mantain national and individual sovereignty over a globally integrated society run by a handful of elitist Eugenisists. The moderator of this blog wishes to be listed among the men who stand for nationalism; not for physical nationalism, such as those who would exclude fellow countrymen due to their skin tone or earlobe size, but a ideological nationalism. Ideologies such as Freedom, Liberty, personal responsibility, independence, decentralized government, checks and balances, national sovereignty, armed citizenry, strong-but-distanced military, citizen police, accountibility in civil servitude, responsible and lawful bylaws, and respect for the Law of the Land. If you are not for these things, may posterity forget that you were my countrymen.)
Why is there such an uproar?
Other than the fact that the word "Freedom" is now a "double-plus ungood" word, the arrangement of words in the new name might just pass by some people.
Glenn Beck and others are angry because they liked the term "Freedom Tower", and because they only changed it to be more marketable; but, what appears to have slipped right by them is the new name!
Let me spell it out, just in case you didn't quite make the connection the first time: One World Trade Center.
They've already begun using the term "1WTC", as that's more acceptable than it's true, full, blatant name of "One World Trade Center".
"One World" is, of course, one of the many terms used by the CFR, Bilderburg, Trilateral Commission, and others in reference to "World Government", also known as the "New World Order", "New Order", "World Order", and "New Economic Order", "New International Order", "Internationalism", and "The Tower of Babel".
(The latter term mostly used by its opponents; opponents being those who wish to mantain national and individual sovereignty over a globally integrated society run by a handful of elitist Eugenisists. The moderator of this blog wishes to be listed among the men who stand for nationalism; not for physical nationalism, such as those who would exclude fellow countrymen due to their skin tone or earlobe size, but a ideological nationalism. Ideologies such as Freedom, Liberty, personal responsibility, independence, decentralized government, checks and balances, national sovereignty, armed citizenry, strong-but-distanced military, citizen police, accountibility in civil servitude, responsible and lawful bylaws, and respect for the Law of the Land. If you are not for these things, may posterity forget that you were my countrymen.)
Tuesday, March 03, 2009
In Their Own Words: New World Order
You've probably heard somebody in the past speak of Globalization and the "New World Order".
This is a phrase that has what is called a "giggle factor", the mere mention of the phrase discrediting the intelligence of the user.
If you use the term, or another like it, when you call-in to any mainstream talk show or television program, you will in all likelihood be cutoff, or you will be ridiculed... and then cutoff.
But where did this phrase come from? Probably some "tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy theorist", right?
Perhaps it was the Malthusian-minded H.G. Wells that first used it for the title of his 1939 book "The New World Order". In this book, he details a Globalist society and an international government. An infamous quote from the book is as follows: "Countless people... will hate the new world order... and will die protesting against it... When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents..." ~H. G. Wells
H. G. Wells was not against the idea, as the entire book stresses the need for such an Order.
Perhaps one book by one man isn't enough to convince the masses that such a thing is taking place. Perhaps one should read a more modern work, such as Henry Kissinger's "The Chance for a New World Order".
Maybe the Prime Minister of Great Britain, Gordon Brown, would be even more mainstream:
Hm, he just used "New World Order" four times, and mentioned globalization four times in under 2 minutes. Nope, still just a conspiracy theory.
Perhaps G. H. W. Bush had a little something to say on the issue:
(Forgive the terrible quality of that last one, but it was the most concise video of all that I've found.)
"My vision of a 'new world order' foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function." ~G. H. W. Bush
"[The war in Iraq is] a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times...a new world order can emerge." ~G. H. W. Bush
"For two centuries we’ve done the hard work of freedom. And tonight we lead the world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity. What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea—a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children’s future." ~G. H. W. Bush
"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN’s founders." ~G. H. W. Bush
"If we do not follow the dictates of our moral compass and stand up for human life, then this lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long."
"We will succeed in the Gulf. And when we do, the world community will have sent an enduring warning to any dictator or despot, present or future, who contemplates outlaw aggression. The world can therefore seize this opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order—where brutality will go unrewarded, and aggression will meet collective resistance." ~G. H. W. Bush
"Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union back into the world order. Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations." ~G. H. W. Bush
Now, here's a guy that needs no introduction:
These are only a small percentage of the uses of the term "New World Order", as I have chosen only the most recognizable names; but here is a name that is recognized the world over:
"National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order." ~Adolf Hitler
Maybe it takes a little more than this to convince some people that there is such a thing as a New World Order, whatever that may be or bring.
Whatever the case, there are a few things that many people don't know about the world around them, and they don't even care.
Perhaps that's how we got to this place in our country's history, people stopped caring enough to know anything but football and celebrities.
How do we fix it? I don't know, but first... you've got to get mad.
"I don't know what to do... but I do know that first, you've got to get mad! You've got to say, 'I'm a human being... my life has value!'" ~Portion of famous Howard Beale speech from the movie "Network"
This is a phrase that has what is called a "giggle factor", the mere mention of the phrase discrediting the intelligence of the user.
If you use the term, or another like it, when you call-in to any mainstream talk show or television program, you will in all likelihood be cutoff, or you will be ridiculed... and then cutoff.
But where did this phrase come from? Probably some "tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy theorist", right?
Perhaps it was the Malthusian-minded H.G. Wells that first used it for the title of his 1939 book "The New World Order". In this book, he details a Globalist society and an international government. An infamous quote from the book is as follows: "Countless people... will hate the new world order... and will die protesting against it... When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents..." ~H. G. Wells
H. G. Wells was not against the idea, as the entire book stresses the need for such an Order.
Perhaps one book by one man isn't enough to convince the masses that such a thing is taking place. Perhaps one should read a more modern work, such as Henry Kissinger's "The Chance for a New World Order".
Maybe the Prime Minister of Great Britain, Gordon Brown, would be even more mainstream:
Hm, he just used "New World Order" four times, and mentioned globalization four times in under 2 minutes. Nope, still just a conspiracy theory.
Perhaps G. H. W. Bush had a little something to say on the issue:
(Forgive the terrible quality of that last one, but it was the most concise video of all that I've found.)
"My vision of a 'new world order' foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function." ~G. H. W. Bush
"[The war in Iraq is] a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times...a new world order can emerge." ~G. H. W. Bush
"For two centuries we’ve done the hard work of freedom. And tonight we lead the world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity. What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea—a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children’s future." ~G. H. W. Bush
"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN’s founders." ~G. H. W. Bush
"If we do not follow the dictates of our moral compass and stand up for human life, then this lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long."
"We will succeed in the Gulf. And when we do, the world community will have sent an enduring warning to any dictator or despot, present or future, who contemplates outlaw aggression. The world can therefore seize this opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order—where brutality will go unrewarded, and aggression will meet collective resistance." ~G. H. W. Bush
"Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union back into the world order. Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations." ~G. H. W. Bush
Now, here's a guy that needs no introduction:
These are only a small percentage of the uses of the term "New World Order", as I have chosen only the most recognizable names; but here is a name that is recognized the world over:
"National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order." ~Adolf Hitler
Maybe it takes a little more than this to convince some people that there is such a thing as a New World Order, whatever that may be or bring.
Whatever the case, there are a few things that many people don't know about the world around them, and they don't even care.
Perhaps that's how we got to this place in our country's history, people stopped caring enough to know anything but football and celebrities.
How do we fix it? I don't know, but first... you've got to get mad.
"I don't know what to do... but I do know that first, you've got to get mad! You've got to say, 'I'm a human being... my life has value!'" ~Portion of famous Howard Beale speech from the movie "Network"
Sunday, March 01, 2009
CPAC, CFR, and The Constitution
"We want every American to be the best he or she chooses to be.
We recognize that we are all individuals. We love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. [Applause]
We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause]
Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you." ~Rush Limbaugh
A great speech overall, but I have a few issues with it, and with the speaker.
First of all, you will notice in the second paragraph that he mentions the "inarguable truth" in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution that we are endowed by our creator with the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Before I continue, let me mention that he was awarded the "Defender of the Constitution" award.
The preamble to the Constitution, you know, the "We the People" document, doesn't say anything about life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness; that's a quote from the Declaration of Independence.
"Ooh, Soory!" ~Alex Trebek
Secondly, how can a man who talks to millions of people everyday, setting the opinion of those who would receive it (don't worry, I'm not a Fairness Doctrine crazy; I know he doesn't set public opinion), be given an award recognizing his "defense of the Constitution", and be lauded as a leader within the "conservative movement" when he puts out the disinformation that the Council on Foreign Relations does not exist.
The Council on Foreign Relations, which has been mentioned on mainstream news programming as actively functioning, is a think-tank for Globalism and one-world government. Many members are politicians such as, admittedly, Dick Cheney:
Ha, ha, ha; Cheney, you are soooo funny.
To understand the basics of the CFR, it requires a goodly amount of time, which I don't currently have, as it is late and I'm slightly cranky. *Smiles Weakly*
Here's an "okay" video that I found; more informative info will follow:
We recognize that we are all individuals. We love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. [Applause]
We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause]
Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you." ~Rush Limbaugh
A great speech overall, but I have a few issues with it, and with the speaker.
First of all, you will notice in the second paragraph that he mentions the "inarguable truth" in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution that we are endowed by our creator with the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Before I continue, let me mention that he was awarded the "Defender of the Constitution" award.
The preamble to the Constitution, you know, the "We the People" document, doesn't say anything about life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness; that's a quote from the Declaration of Independence.
"Ooh, Soory!" ~Alex Trebek
Secondly, how can a man who talks to millions of people everyday, setting the opinion of those who would receive it (don't worry, I'm not a Fairness Doctrine crazy; I know he doesn't set public opinion), be given an award recognizing his "defense of the Constitution", and be lauded as a leader within the "conservative movement" when he puts out the disinformation that the Council on Foreign Relations does not exist.
The Council on Foreign Relations, which has been mentioned on mainstream news programming as actively functioning, is a think-tank for Globalism and one-world government. Many members are politicians such as, admittedly, Dick Cheney:
Ha, ha, ha; Cheney, you are soooo funny.
To understand the basics of the CFR, it requires a goodly amount of time, which I don't currently have, as it is late and I'm slightly cranky. *Smiles Weakly*
Here's an "okay" video that I found; more informative info will follow:
Monday, December 15, 2008
Executing the Laws II
"As we reported yesterday, the Marine Corps Air and Ground Combat Center has dispatched uniformed and presumably armed (we have no confirmation of the latter) soldiers to assist the California Highway Patrol (CHP) in the operation of unconstitutional sobriety checkpoints in San Bernardino County, California, the largest county in California and the country (San Bernardino County is directly east of Los Angeles)." ~Infowars.com (Emphasis mine.)
This is in gross violation of the laws of this nation. This injustice only stands as proof of the blatant disregard for all law by those we would call "Authorities".
Firstly, on the issue of sobriety checkpoints in general, the random and warrantless searches of lawful American motorists' persons and private property without probable cause is undoubtedly illegal.
The 4th Amendment in the Bill of Rights, which was ratified 217 years ago today (the 15th), states in full:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Those who engage in these activities argue that it is state-law that they can perform such warrantless searches.
May I direct their attention to Article VI, Section II of the U.S. Constitution:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." Emphasis added.
Secondly, concerning the issue of members of the U.S. Military engaging in the enforcement of civil law, this violates the oft mentioned Posse Commitatus Act:
"Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
They might try to defend themselves by saying that the Marines are not a part of the Army or Air Force, but are a detachment of the Navy, which is not covered by Posse Commitatus. That would be silly and not in keeping with the nature of the law.
How far will it go?
Sunday, August 31, 2008
In Defense of Free Speech
Alex Jones is a radio talk show host and documentary film maker based in Austin, Texas. He is a paleo-conservative, and he investigates political and social figureheads around America in order to uncover the inner workings of American and likewise global political structure.
While I don’t agree with him on many things, I do respect him and trust him as a news source. He claims and appears to be a Christian, and he frequently mentions the God of the Bible on his radio show.
To be honest, I saw Malkin on FOX News years ago, and I always liked her seemingly "conservative" views, but this was before I knew about her Fascist ideologies.
While I don’t agree with him on many things, I do respect him and trust him as a news source. He claims and appears to be a Christian, and he frequently mentions the God of the Bible on his radio show.
Michelle Malkin is one of the people that Alex Jones has investigated, and he isn’t exactly thrilled about her.
Malkin wrote a book, “In Defense of Internment” in 2004, explaining why she thinks Americans should be put in camps due to their “ethnicity”. She compares and defends the internment of U.S. citizens during WWII with the modern “War on Terror”. She also defends the governments use of un-Constitutional measures to "ensure our safety".
It is unquestionably illegal and un-American to lock up legal citizens simply because of their ancestry. While I understand the reasoning for it in the past, there is no excuse for it, then or now. Just my opinion, but I think I’m right.
Alex Jones confronted Michelle Malkin on her controversial views at the DNC protests. The exact details are sketchy, and I don't want to get any of the facts or timelines wrong, so I’ll let the videos speak for themselves. These videos are taken from different angles.
To be honest, I saw Malkin on FOX News years ago, and I always liked her seemingly "conservative" views, but this was before I knew about her Fascist ideologies.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Vote Da! For Presidento Barackoi Obamakov U.S.S.A. '08
Does Glenn Beck know how write a parody song or what!
This reminds me of a video I did.
Lyrics:
"All hail the 'messiah', Obama, Obama,
The path to the New Socialist Motherland,
Our 'savior', our 'saviour', Obama, Obama,
The leader more famous than Lindsey Lohan."
"Bow down and praise 'the one',
give him your money and your guns.
"Give us a country that makes your wife proud,
'Lord Barry' heal the bitter ones:
white and clinging to faith and to guns."
"Hope for the change
of the hope of the change!"
(Please let me know if the video won't load.)
This reminds me of a video I did.
Lyrics:
"All hail the 'messiah', Obama, Obama,
The path to the New Socialist Motherland,
Our 'savior', our 'saviour', Obama, Obama,
The leader more famous than Lindsey Lohan."
"Bow down and praise 'the one',
give him your money and your guns.
"Give us a country that makes your wife proud,
'Lord Barry' heal the bitter ones:
white and clinging to faith and to guns."
"Hope for the change
of the hope of the change!"
(Please let me know if the video won't load.)
Friday, August 22, 2008
Obelius
Please, get her out of my state! Is it too much to ask for change?
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius revels in killing innocent children, banishing the God-given right to protection, and eliminating hunting in general. She also attended Bilderburg last year.
Obama and Sebelius are equally yolked.
Obama and Sebelius are equally yolked.
If The Obamanation of Desolation has any heart, he will free Kansas of its gubernatorial burden, and choose Sebelius the Terrible as his VP pick.
Oh yeah...Ron Paul for Governor of Kansas!
(Notice: Usage of the above image is prohibited without written consent. See bottom of page.)
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Frogs in Water
Helena, Arkansas has instituted a citywide 24 hour curfew on all residents regardless of age.
One must have a legitimate reason for being outside of one’s house, even if they are on their own property, or they will be sent back in or arrested.
No, I did not make a typographical error, or misunderstand the circumstances; there is, indeed, a 24 hour curfew for all residents of Helena, Arkansas.
The stated reason for this is the high drug trafficking and other such crimes.
The mayor of Helena said that this is to send a message to the criminals that “they don’t own the town, the taxpayers do”.
I am trying to imagine how it is that not allowing private citizens to go out into their own yard on a sunny day is supposed to show that the citizens are in control.
Have you ever watched the reality television show “COPS”?
Have you ever noticed that they will sit and wait until somebody goes to a “known drug house” or “known drug area” before stopping and arresting them? Well, that’s a great idea! Now, they’ll catch more baddies!
That’s like somebody watching a fire at a mall just so they can slap the wrist of any child that gets to close.
Couldn’t they just put out the fire?
No, that would spoil the big picture.
You see, it’s called “Incrementalism”. If you put a frog in a pot of water, and slowly turn up the heat, the frog will eventually boil to death without feeling a thing, because he is cold-blooded, and his body will adapt to the surrounding environment. It eventually gets to a point where the environment cannot sustain life, and the frog dies.
They are slowly, by design, taking a little bit of that freedom, and a little bit of that liberty, trying not to disturb the sensitive American mindset.
Now, to what end is this plan? What’s the endgame?
The end result for the frog is…a boiled frog.
The end result for America is…what?
I don’t know.
We can only study the facts, and hypothesize the results. Many have done this, with some guessing better than others.
“Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.” ~George Orwell
One must have a legitimate reason for being outside of one’s house, even if they are on their own property, or they will be sent back in or arrested.
No, I did not make a typographical error, or misunderstand the circumstances; there is, indeed, a 24 hour curfew for all residents of Helena, Arkansas.
The stated reason for this is the high drug trafficking and other such crimes.
The mayor of Helena said that this is to send a message to the criminals that “they don’t own the town, the taxpayers do”.
I am trying to imagine how it is that not allowing private citizens to go out into their own yard on a sunny day is supposed to show that the citizens are in control.
Have you ever watched the reality television show “COPS”?
Have you ever noticed that they will sit and wait until somebody goes to a “known drug house” or “known drug area” before stopping and arresting them? Well, that’s a great idea! Now, they’ll catch more baddies!
That’s like somebody watching a fire at a mall just so they can slap the wrist of any child that gets to close.
Couldn’t they just put out the fire?
No, that would spoil the big picture.
You see, it’s called “Incrementalism”. If you put a frog in a pot of water, and slowly turn up the heat, the frog will eventually boil to death without feeling a thing, because he is cold-blooded, and his body will adapt to the surrounding environment. It eventually gets to a point where the environment cannot sustain life, and the frog dies.
They are slowly, by design, taking a little bit of that freedom, and a little bit of that liberty, trying not to disturb the sensitive American mindset.
Now, to what end is this plan? What’s the endgame?
The end result for the frog is…a boiled frog.
The end result for America is…what?
I don’t know.
We can only study the facts, and hypothesize the results. Many have done this, with some guessing better than others.
“Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.” ~George Orwell
Tuesday, July 01, 2008
In Their Own Words
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." ~David Rockefeller
"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." ~David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." ~From The National Educator, K.M. Heaton
"A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." ~Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine.
"National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order." ~Adolph Hitler
"Under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner. . . . [This is compassionate liberalism.]" ~Bernard Shaw, in his Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928
"The New Deal is plainly an attempt to achieve a working socialism and avert a social collapse in America; it is extraordinarily parallel to the successive 'policies' and 'Plans' of the Russian experiment. Americans shirk the word 'socialism', but what else can one call it?" ~H.G. Wells, The New World Order 1939
"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders." ~President George Bush, 1991
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." ~Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." ~Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." ~David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." ~From The National Educator, K.M. Heaton
"A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." ~Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine.
"National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order." ~Adolph Hitler
"Under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner. . . . [This is compassionate liberalism.]" ~Bernard Shaw, in his Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928
"The New Deal is plainly an attempt to achieve a working socialism and avert a social collapse in America; it is extraordinarily parallel to the successive 'policies' and 'Plans' of the Russian experiment. Americans shirk the word 'socialism', but what else can one call it?" ~H.G. Wells, The New World Order 1939
"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders." ~President George Bush, 1991
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." ~Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." ~Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
Sunday, June 22, 2008
America: 1776-1984
The Supreme Court is going to rule Monday* on whether or not the Constitution counts anymore. Of course, we can make an educated guess on how they’re going to rule.
Interestingly enough, they chose to wait and rule at the last minute before the summer dismissal to rule. I would imagine that most of them will be out of the country. Smart move on their part.
We can expect quite a big response to this. Some will be whining about it, but I'm sure most will be defending the decision. The Brady Bun--…er…Campaign will probably be parading in the streets, but only if they get a permit to exercise their First Amendment Right.
Free Speech is a privilege, not a right. Otherwise, why would you have to get a permit?
Freedom against unreasonable searches and seizures is a privilege, not a right. Otherwise, why would the Strike Teams break into houses after natural disasters and take away any protection against looters or ask to see your papers at unlawful roadblocks, for no apparent or lawful reason.
Powers delegated to the States or to the people are privileges, not rights. Otherwise, why would the Federal Government -- among other things -- remove thousands of National Guard troops from border states, while the state legislatures beg them to allow the “National Guard” to “Guard the Nation”.
So, why should the Second Amendment be any different?
[UPDATE] 6/26: The Supreme Court has ruled against the D.C. Gun Ban. Huzzah!
---------------------------------
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” ~Johann Goethe
"The answer to 1984 is 1776." ~Alex Jones
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Has it Become Destructive of These Ends?
I never like to just post a link to a story, but I feel that there is a time and place for everything.
I would only like to say that this is sensitive topic that no one seems to care about, which makes it all the more serious.
And I feel words alone cannot describe the sobering emotions that things such as this bring into one's mind.
Never in America?
I would only like to say that this is sensitive topic that no one seems to care about, which makes it all the more serious.
And I feel words alone cannot describe the sobering emotions that things such as this bring into one's mind.
Never in America?
Monday, June 16, 2008
Sooner or Later, God Will Cut You Down!
David Rockefeller, the man many would call “American Capitalism incarnate“, wrote this in Memoirs, (p.405): “For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” (Emphasis added for those who skim through quotes)
Unfortunately for true freedom loving Americans, the House Committee on Un-American Activities expired in 1975. Otherwise, he should be investigated for conspiring with foreign entities to overthrow the Constitution, and then imprisoned.
And by the way, what does he mean by “conspiring with others”? What others? This is a truly astounding quote, as it is an admission of there actually being a group of other people trying to bring down the United States of America.
But what is this group?
In 1954, David Rockefeller instituted the group known as Bilderburg. This group first met in The Netherlands at a place named Hotel de Bilderburg.
This is a closed door organization, with the members taking an oath of secrecy (they like to call it “an understanding“, a term also used by the Bohemian Club), though some details of each meeting are leaked by the aides of the high ranking officials.
So what is discussed at these annual meetings? Sports? Book of the Month? Or maybe major foreign policy, internal policy, and monetary policy?
What’s wrong with that? I’ll tell you what’s wrong: Did you vote for the Kings of Spain or Sweden? How about the Princes of Wales, Orange, Liechtenstien, or Denmark?
Don’t you think that the little matter of state sovereignty might slightly be infringed when foreigners whose names you can’t pronounce and you’ve never even heard of are telling your government what to do about everything from traffic laws to trade relations?
Did you even hear that 150 of these people were even meeting in the same hotel in Chantilly, Virginia? Why not? Haven’t been keeping up with the news?
Well, it seems the Mainstream Media decided not to cover this little happening; it’s not big enough for a slow news day. They’ll talk about surfboarding ducks, but not about a hundred or so major political heads and policy makers staying at the Westfields Marriot in Virginia to hold a secret meeting.
If they even caught wind of a possible secret meeting between Lost producers and Paris Hilton at a Motel 8 in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, they’d beat down the door to get in. But not 150 kings, queens, presidents, and such. BORINGGGGGG.
Bilderburg: Web Search it! You can find a complete list of attendees here at Wikipedia.
Unfortunately for true freedom loving Americans, the House Committee on Un-American Activities expired in 1975. Otherwise, he should be investigated for conspiring with foreign entities to overthrow the Constitution, and then imprisoned.
And by the way, what does he mean by “conspiring with others”? What others? This is a truly astounding quote, as it is an admission of there actually being a group of other people trying to bring down the United States of America.
But what is this group?
In 1954, David Rockefeller instituted the group known as Bilderburg. This group first met in The Netherlands at a place named Hotel de Bilderburg.
This is a closed door organization, with the members taking an oath of secrecy (they like to call it “an understanding“, a term also used by the Bohemian Club), though some details of each meeting are leaked by the aides of the high ranking officials.
So what is discussed at these annual meetings? Sports? Book of the Month? Or maybe major foreign policy, internal policy, and monetary policy?
What’s wrong with that? I’ll tell you what’s wrong: Did you vote for the Kings of Spain or Sweden? How about the Princes of Wales, Orange, Liechtenstien, or Denmark?
Don’t you think that the little matter of state sovereignty might slightly be infringed when foreigners whose names you can’t pronounce and you’ve never even heard of are telling your government what to do about everything from traffic laws to trade relations?
Did you even hear that 150 of these people were even meeting in the same hotel in Chantilly, Virginia? Why not? Haven’t been keeping up with the news?
Well, it seems the Mainstream Media decided not to cover this little happening; it’s not big enough for a slow news day. They’ll talk about surfboarding ducks, but not about a hundred or so major political heads and policy makers staying at the Westfields Marriot in Virginia to hold a secret meeting.
If they even caught wind of a possible secret meeting between Lost producers and Paris Hilton at a Motel 8 in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, they’d beat down the door to get in. But not 150 kings, queens, presidents, and such. BORINGGGGGG.
Bilderburg: Web Search it! You can find a complete list of attendees here at Wikipedia.
Friday, May 30, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Websites That Make This One Possible
